CVE-2026-74620

Unknown

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_gact, act_police: range check the fallback control action tcf_action_check_ctrlact() range checks the primary control action: if (!opcode) ret = action > TC_ACT_VALUE_MAX ? -EINVAL : 0; TC_ACT_VALUE_MAX is TC_ACT_TRAP, so kernel-internal verdicts above it cannot be set that way. But act_gact and act_police each carry a second, independent control action supplied by user space that never reaches that helper - TCA_GACT_PROB.paction and TCA_POLICE_RESULT. Both only reject TC_ACT_GOTO_CHAIN, so any other value is stored verbatim and returned verbatim from the action. In particular user space can store TC_ACT_CONSUMED, which is TC_ACT_VALUE_MAX + 1 and is deliberately not part of the UAPI value range. That verdict tells every caller the action took ownership of the skb, so nobody frees it: sch_handle_ingress(), sch_handle_egress() and tcf_qevent_handle() all deliberately skip the free for it. The result is one leaked sk_buff plus its data buffer per packet traversing the filter, unbounded, for all traffic on the chain including kernel-generated packets. Both are trivially deterministic. act_gact clamps tcfg_pval to >= 1, so with pval = 1 gact_determ() returns the fallback for every packet. act_police has no mandatory rate, so rate = 0 leaves tcfp_mtu = ~0 and tcf_police_mtu_check() always passes. TC_ACT_CONSUMED was added by commit 720f22fed81b ("net: sched: refactor reinsert action"), after both goto-chain guards were written: commit 9469f375ab09 ("net/sched: act_gact: disallow 'goto chain' on fallback control action") and commit c08f5ed5d625 ("net/sched: act_police: disallow 'goto chain' on fallback control action"). Neither guard was widened when the new verdict appeared. Factor the existing range test out of tcf_action_check_ctrlact() as tcf_action_valid() and apply it to both fallbacks. The helper cannot call tcf_action_check_ctrlact() directly because that also allocates a goto_chain, which is exactly what these two sites must not do. Reproduced on v7.2-rc6: kmemleak reports one leaked 232-byte skbuff_head_cache object plus its 704-byte data buffer per packet. With this patch both configurations are rejected with -EINVAL and kmemleak reports none.

SeverityUnknown
CVSS—
Exploit probability—
ProductLinux
PublishedAug 22, 2026
First seenAug 22, 2026

How to fix

Update
  • Linux Linux5f038affdacaffedf6a85a06cf59ec0a852d36a7, efa58aeb6a99028b1fbc3ab2f31ba3a881211ad4, 725efc2ab4a40affc4e285a2dc4896d103948a6c, 6bcb8839aa2d686964a4154650afc4db91e1c514, 5344e01179baa37547ab29fd7b8614f83faa190c, 92f00f1d4d204a428b38e26fce3baee144b6955d, 2e8df8c9190335475a3b64a159d3efd8cdd1cb73, 883b56ae58fe657d8497806c7059646e9ba6dbd0 or later

Affected products

ProductAffected versionsFixed in
Linux Linux720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 5f038affdacaffedf6a85a06cf59ec0a852d36a7, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < efa58aeb6a99028b1fbc3ab2f31ba3a881211ad4, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 725efc2ab4a40affc4e285a2dc4896d103948a6c, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 6bcb8839aa2d686964a4154650afc4db91e1c514, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 5344e01179baa37547ab29fd7b8614f83faa190c, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 92f00f1d4d204a428b38e26fce3baee144b6955d, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 2e8df8c9190335475a3b64a159d3efd8cdd1cb73, 720f22fed81bc6fd1765db7014651b6718887bea ≤ v < 883b56ae58fe657d8497806c7059646e9ba6dbd0, 5.35f038affdacaffedf6a85a06cf59ec0a852d36a7, efa58aeb6a99028b1fbc3ab2f31ba3a881211ad4, 725efc2ab4a40affc4e285a2dc4896d103948a6c, 6bcb8839aa2d686964a4154650afc4db91e1c514, 5344e01179baa37547ab29fd7b8614f83faa190c, 92f00f1d4d204a428b38e26fce3baee144b6955d, 2e8df8c9190335475a3b64a159d3efd8cdd1cb73, 883b56ae58fe657d8497806c7059646e9ba6dbd0

Check your version

Choose the product and enter the version you run to see whether it falls in the affected range.

In the Intelligence 360 plan

Attack Surface Management

See the assets tied to your domains, the technologies they run and known vulnerabilities in one list.