CVE-2026-89530
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: svcrdma: Reject inline replies that overflow the pull-up buffer An RPC-over-RDMA client can request a reply, such as an NFS READ payload, without providing a Write list or a Reply chunk to carry it. When such a reply needs more scatter/gather entries than the device's Send Queue supports, svc_rdma_pull_up_needed() selects pull-up and svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg() linearizes the whole reply into sctxt->sc_xprt_buf. That buffer is only sc_max_req_size bytes, while the reply on this path is bounded only by the client's request, so svc_rdma_xb_linearize() copies past the end of the buffer and corrupts adjacent slab memory. The oversized length is then stored in sc_sges[0].length and posted, so the device also reads beyond the mapped region. The SGE-exhaustion branch is the only pull-up path that can exceed the buffer: the threshold branch pulls up only replies smaller than RPCRDMA_PULLUP_THRESH, and replies that fit the device's SGE budget are sent directly without linearization. Make svc_rdma_pull_up_needed() report -E2BIG when the reply it would pull up cannot fit sc_max_req_size, and fail the request with ERR_CHUNK as RFC 8166 Section 4.5.3 directs rather than dropping the connection. The helper no longer answers a simple yes/no question: it now reports pull-up, no pull-up, or -E2BIG for a reply too large to linearize. Rename svc_rdma_pull_up_needed() to svc_rdma_check_pull_up() so its name no longer implies a boolean predicate.
How to fix
- Linux Linuxb73011049dbe909f73fd9620d94ef1757d7af2eb, 8068358f445a11296328ffa7c524701596814a17, fcd91b9957462d398792201c239dffaeff1cc8b2, 1949dd1576f7a8aa161b1330c6125df9d53046d5, 8ec60eb51fae37cd3d334ff26e4a7d6fb21ff7cf, 0fbe20dfe74b783d255bf389a6ea77aa25dc7860, 4.20, 4.21 or later
Affected products
| Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf ≤ v < b73011049dbe909f73fd9620d94ef1757d7af2eb, e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf ≤ v < 8068358f445a11296328ffa7c524701596814a17, e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf ≤ v < fcd91b9957462d398792201c239dffaeff1cc8b2, e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf ≤ v < 1949dd1576f7a8aa161b1330c6125df9d53046d5, e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf ≤ v < 8ec60eb51fae37cd3d334ff26e4a7d6fb21ff7cf, e248aa7be86e8179f20ac0931774ecd746f3f5bf ≤ v < 0fbe20dfe74b783d255bf389a6ea77aa25dc7860, 9b65b18f817d9ada2bf67351f24bdcce6789a0bb, d564356e1919d1178568c19af410cfc1a9076663, 4.19.22 ≤ v < 4.20, 4.20.9 ≤ v < 4.21, 5.0 | b73011049dbe909f73fd9620d94ef1757d7af2eb, 8068358f445a11296328ffa7c524701596814a17, fcd91b9957462d398792201c239dffaeff1cc8b2, 1949dd1576f7a8aa161b1330c6125df9d53046d5, 8ec60eb51fae37cd3d334ff26e4a7d6fb21ff7cf, 0fbe20dfe74b783d255bf389a6ea77aa25dc7860, 4.20, 4.21 |
Check your version
Choose the product and enter the version you run to see whether it falls in the affected range.
Attack Surface Management
See the assets tied to your domains, the technologies they run and known vulnerabilities in one list.