CVE-2026-99252
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/mpscq: disable preemption while pushing A push makes the node the new tail, and then links it to its predecessor. In between the queue isn't empty, but mpscq_pop() can't get at the node. The consumers deal with that by trying again, with a cond_resched() in the loop to give a preempted producer the chance to finish. cond_resched() doesn't do that if the consumer has a higher priority than the producer and both have to use the same CPU: producer (SCHED_OTHER) consumer (SCHED_FIFO), same CPU io_req_local_work_add() mpscq_push() prev = xchg(&q->tail, node) <preempted> io_cqring_wait() __io_run_local_work() again: cond_resched() // nothing to do mpscq_pop() // NULL // work pending, no events yet goto again The producer can be any task that is able to queue task_work for the ring: an io-wq worker, or somebody who sends a message with IORING_OP_MSG_RING. The consumer spins, holding ->uring_lock, until the scheduler takes pity on the fair class, which takes about a second with the default settings of the fair server, and forever without it. The loops in tctx_task_work_run() and io_cancel_local_task_work() have the same problem. Don't allow preemption between the two steps. That bounds the time the window is open on the CPU of the producer by what interrupts take, and a consumer that waits for that is on another CPU. The cost is a preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair per push.
How to fix
- Linux Linux8c94677e2b6145393d4c129fe0f5364b0e5000a5, 68a95c3968895cd198f42baadb23e635fecc5a66 or later
Affected products
| Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Linux Linux | 50cb44bd0d5f243919a06b17b1d979fdcd72cb2b ≤ v < 8c94677e2b6145393d4c129fe0f5364b0e5000a5, 50cb44bd0d5f243919a06b17b1d979fdcd72cb2b ≤ v < 68a95c3968895cd198f42baadb23e635fecc5a66, 7.2 | 8c94677e2b6145393d4c129fe0f5364b0e5000a5, 68a95c3968895cd198f42baadb23e635fecc5a66 |
Check your version
Choose the product and enter the version you run to see whether it falls in the affected range.
Attack Surface Management
See the assets tied to your domains, the technologies they run and known vulnerabilities in one list.